3DWannabe Blog

Constitutional Failure

Anyone who knows me is aware that I am a strict constitutionalist. The men who drafted it were clear in both language and intent. Language like ’shall not be infringed’ and ‘The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’ isn’t ambiguous to me, as it seems to be to so many others. However, it was written by men. Men aren’t perfect, so there were bound to be mistakes. or areas where the language wasn’t clear enough. The amendment process is there to correct any mistakes, the Supreme Court is there to clear up any clarity issues. 

Did you know….

… that they put beautiful women in ads because they get better ratings than ugly women? Did you know that they will put a hispanic in an ad just because the ad will be played in a hispanic area? These decisions are made in terms of marketing and demographics. What plays best to what audience.

Now, here is the million dollar question: Did you know that a presidential campaign is largely marketing?

Harry Reid isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed, but he can tell you that a light skinned, clear speaking black person has a better chance of getting elected than a dark skinned hip-hop rapper. The nerve of the man to actually say it. (Personally I think the USA is color blind enough that the skin color wouldn’t really be the issue, it would be the ‘urban-english’ that would kill such a candidate. The President represents the United States of America, we all, white and black, want him to sound clear and intelligent.) They were talking strategy and electability, in this case Reid was correct and the election results bear that out.

Should Reid resign over this? Hell no. (It does show the double standard the liberals have, they would be crucifying Rush Limbauh over this.) What he said was factual and normal in a marketing meeting. I don’t know why he felt he needed to apologize, I don’t know why Obama felt he needed to. I think Steele and the Republicans mis-fired on this one. Should have taken the high road and ignored it. They look a bit petty in my opinion.

Another Obama Trifecta

Let’s see…

1. Obama has completely ignored the protest in Iran, instead choosing to side with the existing government by his inaction. They are shooting their own people, running them down in cars etc. No one is saying call in the troops, but maybe a bit stronger condemnation, call for a emergency UN meeting? Something? Are we in favor of freedom or not? Obama has picked a side and it’s not the one the American people would choose.

2. He has completely miss-handled the terror attacks, calling it an isolated incident before he had the slightest clue if it was or not (it wasn’t), his person in charge claimed the system worked (it didn’t) and he announced that he and his administration would not rest until everyone involved was brought to justice while he continued to vacation in Hawaii. (At least the illness of a family friends child pulled him off the golf course)

3. Once again the arrogance of the man shown like a blinding light. Did you listen to him? “I ordered”, “I directed”. Never, I have acted on the advice of, Secretary whoever will be in charge, while I am in charge I have hired people smarter than me in this area to work on this. Based on his decision making capability shown so far I’d be happier if he had more confidence in the people he put in charge. (But that is a whole other can of worms, Van Jones anyone? I can’t think of one of those people that was brought in as the most capable for the job, instead they were brought in as the most ideologically compatible comrade)

I hope the 2010 election throws the house so far to the right we can start impeachment hearings, even Biden is looking pretty good right now.

Tiger Woods

As the count is now up to 10, does anyone believe he’s sorry? You can be sorry after one affair and wish it never happened, but this guy isn’t sorry. Only that it went public. Only that his life got complicated. This is one of those cases where the pre-nup should be thrown out of court for infidelity. She should get 50% + child support clean and simple. He’s a scum bag and should be treated as such.

That being said, can we get CNN to move on to something else? There’s this little health care thing and an energy policy this dope of a president is getting us in to that we need to pay attention to!

RAID’s work!

A few days ago my mouth went dry, panic began to well up inside of me. I store all my graphic assets on a network drive so I can access them from multiple computers. It’s been great for the last couple of years. I got the 1 TB unit on sale at Best Buy for $230 and set it up as a RAID 1, which mirrors your data on two internal drives.

Sunday it took FOREVER to access a file. I ran the disk manager and the DRIVE A FAILED message chilled my soul. Every model I’ve ever made was on that drive. Every render I’ve done. Assets and tutorials I paid more money than my wife knows about, all on that drive.  With not much confidence I told the unit to copy everything to my system hard drive. In theory, everything was on drive b, just not efficiently, the auto backup is the whole point of a RAID 1 setup.

IT WORKED!!!!! It took 24 hours, but it’s all safely on another drive, two other drives actually, and a replacement raid drive is on it’s way. Ahhhhhhh……

New model

A new model I’ll be adding to the free stuff link on the right. It’s a lightwave model, needed a tablet for a render and didn’t have one. Let me know if you use it, or any other feed back.

Almost there…..

I’ve heard a lot of teeth gnashing over the White House attacking Fox News. Everything they are doing is obviously trying to marginalize Fox, which has been the only mass-market organization to not join the Obama band-wagon. I’ve read articles about how this is the end of free speech. I’ve heard still others that predict Fox’s future is bleak because it’s the President who is doing the talking and people will listen.

Personally I look at this as great news! For 10 months this administration and the Democratic party have completely ignored anyone that doesn’t agree with them with an arrogance I’ve never seen before. They’ve never stopped to answer the many legitimate questions people have about health care reform and cap & trade because they were sure they didn’t have to. That you, the people of the United States, were merely sheep looking to be led by them. (Make no mistake, Obama / Pelosi / Reid do not think you are capable or qualified to think or decide for yourself) Thanks to Fox News we know that there are questions that need to be asked. It’s up to us to make sure they get answered.

It’s time to re-double all efforts to bring the truth to forefront. It’s time to demand that bills be made available to the public at least 72 hours before a vote so the people can let their representatives know what they think about it. It’s time to ask the hard questions on how they will pay for it before passage. It’s time to demand that the president makes himself available to answer the questions put to him, rather than just publish the same campaign rhetoric that we’ve heard for 2 years running. The chafing from the Obama administration means that Fox has finally gotten their fingernails under the lid and that they realize that people are noticing the lack of answers coming from Washington. Unfortunately Obama’s reaction is to attack Fox News rather than to engage the opposition and answer any questions.

When you hear Obama and other deride Fox News, just remember some of the things that the ‘real’ news organizations would never have told you:

• Acorn gives tax advice to illegal activities
• Obama press secretary Anita Dunn’s favorite philosopher is Chairman Mao
• That Obama appointed Van Jones to a green jobs position and that he is an admitted communist.
• The seemingly endless stream of Obama appointees with tax problems. Including the one in charge of the IRS.
• All the favors Chris Dodd has done for the financial institutions that fall under the committee he chairs, and the favors he received in return. (You or I would be in jail)
• Barney Frank’s demand of favors to him from bailout companies.

…. and the list goes on. I’m interested in these things, even if Obama isn’t. Even if CNN, MSNBC and the others aren’t. Every one of these stories was dismissed and denied until Fox wouldn’t let them go and the truth came out.

Marginalized or not, Fox is the only news source with the integrity to report on stories like these. The other networks have equity in the Obama presidency, with their main reporters and commentators having openly endorsed him. (Chris Mathews, Fareed Zakaria to name a couple) You will NOT get reporting from these people, you will get cheerleading. Chris Mathews went as far as to say that he thought it was the medias duty to support Obama and his agenda. I repeat, you will NOT get reporting from these people.

In his best campaign rhetoric, Obama says that the case is clear, the evidence overwhelming for his agenda. If this is true he should have no fear to go anywhere, anytime to present his case, It up to us to demand that he does. It’s up to the media to investigate if he’s telling the truth. Which organization do you want to trust to do that?

BOP Image ready

Spent a few hours with Paint Shop Pro. Grabbed the image from the schematics of the ship. cleaned it up and gave it the right orange color. Looks pretty good, hopes are high.

UV or not to UV?

Well, I’m making a real effort to understand UV mapping, instead of just using them and being amazed it worked. I’m watching the basic uv mapping videos from kurv studios. A lot of great info, but some really weird stuff as well. Weight maps, layers and additional geometry to make a uv you can’t see unless you render instead of just making new surface? Really? But I am picking up quite a bit. Then I figured out how to use the PLG uv plugin. Why newtek doesn’t buy this one and throw it in the box I’ll never know. (maybe not even buy, just ask?) Really makes atlas mapping easy compared to the standard tools! Now, back to the warbird model….

Paradigm Shift

While we have seen evidence in the past of the schism between the right and the left, it has never become as clear and defined as it has during the debate on Obamacare and nationalized health care in general. It often strikes me as amazing how people can look at the same question in the same setting and come up with such different answers. Clearly there is a difference in the base definitions that the two sides are using and how they see the world. I was listening to a radio program the other day that helped me understand it. It was a right wing radio host interviewing a left wing book author and the host asked if he supported Obamacare. Predictably the answer was yes, but it was the reason why that was interesting. The author said he believed that it was part of doing what the US Constitution prescribed, to provide for the common welfare. The radio host corrected him and quoted the correct language, that the government is to PROMOTE the common welfare, but it had no effect on the author. That an author, someone who makes their living with words, would completely disregard the differences between “provide” and “promote” is perhaps a ponter as to why people who read the constitution see issues differently than those who interpret the constitution, such as the book author in this interview. (Link to the US Constitution is in the upper right corner if you would like to see it.)

The definitions…
Promote: contribute to the progress or growth of
Provide: give something useful or necessary to

Synonyms for these words……
Promote:Advance, Boost, Further, Encourage
Provide: Supply, Render, Furnish

If, and this is another question, the American people decide that it is in the general welfare for everyone to have health insurance, the governments role is not to provide it, but rather to encourage it and help it become available. Nothing in the constitution says anything about taxing everyone to provide heath insurance to those that don’t have it.

There are examples of the government looking out for the general welfare in a positive way. The interstate highway system in an excellent example of the government promoting the general welfare. This system opened up opportunities across the country, single handedly creating new industries and jobs. (Not without a cost however. It also brought about the demise of the local economy since it was now just as fast and even cheaper to buy from across the country) In the early history of the United States this clause in the constitution was used to promote the growth of the country and providing it’s citizens with opportunities through actions such as the Lousiana Purchase and other land annexations that eventually redefined the United States’ borders.

On the other side we have examples of the government providing for the common welfare and they are all disasters. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Public Housing, the list of failures is as long as the list of attempts. I would prefer that the federal government start to act on the issues that the constitution requires, securing the borders from terrorists and illegal entry, defense and insuring our freedoms are protected and apply to every citizen. Leave the rest to us, the States and the People.